CryptoNews.com launched in 2017. They publish crypto news, price predictions, and presale reviews. The site claims 2 million monthly readers and a team of 70+ professionals.

For anyone researching crypto projects, understanding how these platforms work matters. Revenue models shape content. Incentives influence what gets published and how projects get framed.

This analysis examines CryptoNews.com's business practices, track record, and user feedback.

How CryptoNews.com Makes Money

CryptoNews operates multiple revenue streams. Affiliate commissions appear on every article, but that's just the visible layer.

The site offers "marketing packages" to crypto projects. These packages, reportedly reaching five and six-figure amounts, include article placements, listicle features, and "independent reviews." Projects that purchase packages receive positive coverage framed as editorial content.

Projects that decline these offers often notice a pattern. Suddenly their legitimate developments receive skeptical analysis. Their presales get labeled "speculative" or "high risk" while anonymous competitors with purchased packages get "top pick" status.

The approach is strategic. Sales teams contact projects directly. They pitch visibility and credibility through CryptoNews coverage. Purchase the package, receive positive articles. Decline the package, risk negative coverage or complete omission.

This isn't traditional affiliate marketing. It's structured pay-for-play disguised as journalism.

Revenue through these methods creates obvious conflicts. Editorial content becomes advertising. "Independent analysis" becomes paid promotion. Readers can't tell the difference because disclosure practices remain vague.

Content Quality and Track Record Analysis

CryptoNews publishes hundreds of articles monthly. Volume is impressive. Accuracy is another story.

Projects promoted with "1000x potential" headlines share one thing: affiliate partnerships. Not a single project they labeled with four-digit return predictions succeeded. Zero.

Worse, these weren't gradual declines. Most crashed in the first week post-launch. Tokens that CryptoNews hyped as "best presale 2025" or "next 100x" often lost 80-95% of value within days.

Analysis shows roughly 92% of their promoted presales failed or crashed significantly. The remaining 8% either stayed flat or showed small gains. None came close to predicted returns.

The math is simple. CryptoNews earned affiliate commissions when investors bought in. Those investors lost money immediately. CryptoNews kept the commissions.

This pattern repeats across years of coverage. When every "1000x" prediction fails and every failure involves an affiliate deal, you're not looking at bad luck. You're looking at a business model.

Community Feedback and User Reviews

Trustpilot tells a different story than CryptoNews's marketing claims.

Trustpilot review from Australian user warning against CryptoNews.com for promoting scams daily

Australian user, September 2025: "DO NOT TRUST this company. They promote scams daily. It's absolutely disgusting and should be highly illegal"

Trustpilot review highlighting CryptoNews paid advertising affecting content trustworthiness

Spanish user, August 2025: "They promote articles about crypto scam cloudmining. They tarnish there reputation just for paid advertising. Dont trust this website. Not trustworthy at all!"

Direct mention of paid advertising affecting content. Same concern we identified.

Trustpilot review noting unverified scam and spam articles on CryptoNews

Ukrainian user, October 2024: "Many scam and spam articles published not verified even"

Three users, three countries, same complaints. Pattern or coincidence?

Positive reviews exist on Trustpilot. But negative feedback focuses on specific, repeated issues: promotion of failed projects, affiliate bias, lack of verification. These match what the data shows.

The Pay-to-Play Problem

Pattern recognition is simple once you know what to look for.

Projects featured in "Top 5" listicles or "Best Presales 2026" articles typically purchased placement. These aren't organic editorial picks. They're sponsored content presented as independent analysis.

Legitimate projects with working products, verified teams, and real roadmaps that declined paid packages receive cautious coverage or get ignored entirely. Anonymous presales with nothing but whitepapers that paid for packages appear as "top picks."

Marketing packages buy positive articles, listicle inclusion, and price prediction coverage. Higher-tier packages add more prominent placement and multiple features over time.

Projects that can't or won't pay these amounts face a choice: accept minimal or negative coverage, or pay for visibility. Many legitimate projects refuse on principle. Many questionable projects pay willingly.

CryptoNews promoted casinos as "no KYC." Users reported those same casinos requiring verification and blocking withdrawals. Those casinos paid for promotional packages. Users lost money. CryptoNews profited from both the package fee and affiliate commissions.

This business model prioritizes revenue over reader protection.

How to Verify Crypto Information Independently

Don't rely on any single source. Diversify information like you diversify investments.

Start with on-chain data. Etherscan and similar explorers show real numbers: token distribution, holder counts, transactions. Data doesn't lie.

Check multiple sources. Compare what different platforms say. When one site differs dramatically from others, ask why.

Read project docs directly. Whitepapers and roadmaps tell you what teams plan to build. Compare promises against actual delivery.

Join community channels. Real communities discuss substance. Bot channels spam generic hype. The difference is obvious.

Research team backgrounds. LinkedIn, GitHub, past projects reveal more than marketing copy. Anonymous teams should trigger caution regardless of what review sites claim.

Should You Trust CryptoNews Reviews?

Use it as one source among many. Never as your primary research.

The site publishes useful content sometimes. But the business model creates bias that affects everything.

When CryptoNews labels something a "top presale" or predicts massive gains, ask one question: does this project pay affiliate commissions? That usually explains the enthusiasm.

Read the article. Note the project name. Then verify everything yourself using independent sources. Let CryptoNews introduce projects. Let actual data determine whether you invest.

Crypto needs reliable information. Sites funded entirely by affiliate commissions from projects they review face impossible conflicts. Until that changes, approach such content with skepticism.

Smart investors check claims before risking money. Especially when the source gets paid if you buy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CryptoNews.com a scam?

CryptoNews is not a scam in the traditional sense. It operates as a media platform with multiple revenue streams including affiliate commissions and paid marketing packages. However, the practice of selling positive coverage while framing it as independent journalism creates serious ethical concerns and conflicts of interest.

How does CryptoNews sell coverage to projects?

Industry reports suggest CryptoNews offers marketing packages that can reach five and six-figure amounts. These packages typically include article placements, listicle features, price predictions, and "independent reviews." Projects that purchase packages receive positive coverage, while those that decline often face skeptical analysis or omission.

How accurate are CryptoNews price predictions?

Track record shows poor accuracy. Projects promoted with "1000x potential" consistently fail. Analysis reveals approximately 92% of heavily promoted presales crashed in the first week post-launch. Not a single project labeled with four-digit return predictions achieved those targets.

Does CryptoNews label sponsored content clearly?

Disclosure practices are vague. While affiliate links include standard "Ad Disclosure" notices, paid package content often appears as regular editorial coverage without clear sponsorship labels. Readers typically cannot distinguish between paid placements and actual editorial picks.

Should I use CryptoNews for crypto research?

Use it as one source among many, never as your sole research tool. Be especially skeptical of "top picks," listicle features, and extreme price predictions. These often represent paid placements rather than merit-based selection. Verify all claims independently using on-chain data and multiple sources.

What are better alternatives to CryptoNews?

Focus on on-chain data (Etherscan, DexScreener), community discussions (Reddit, Twitter), direct project documentation, and analysis from sources without pay-for-coverage models. No single platform should drive investment decisions.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.